Debt up, yields up, credibility down

By Our Reporter
0
134
President Trump’s freshly passed Big Beautiful Bill may have satisfied his base, but it’s rattled the markets

President Trump’s freshly passed Big Beautiful Bill may have satisfied his base, but it’s rattled the markets. Behind the televised signing and bold promises lies a structural problem that no rally can hide: a widening fiscal gap colliding head-on with a reluctant central bank.

Dr Komal Sri-Kumar, president of Sri-Kumar Global Strategies, argues the consequences will come faster than Washington expects. “The President’s fiscal and trade policies are pulling in one direction, and the Fed’s inflation mandate is pulling in the other,” he warns. “And in the tug-of-war between political ambition and economic fundamentals, yields will be the major casualty.”

The bill is forecast to add between $3 and $5 trillion to the national debt over the next decade, on top of a debt load already topping $37 trillion. That figure now sits above 120% of US GDP. In 2024, interest payments outpaced defence spending. Treasury issuance is set to surge further, not just at the short end of the curve but across all maturities, putting more pressure on long-dated yields.

The administration insists the bill’s tax cuts and incentives will pay for themselves through faster growth. That assumption, says Sri-Kumar, is deeply optimistic. “Financing the deficits will require higher yields to attract sufficient demand for the securities, further raising the cost of servicing the debt.”

It’s a setup ripe for conflict. Trump has repeatedly lashed out at Fed Chair Jerome Powell, calling him “a numbskull” and “stupid” for holding back on rate cuts. But Powell isn’t budging. Protected by law and backed by a Supreme Court ruling that affirms the Fed’s independence, Powell has signalled no intent to resign before his term expires in May 2026. And despite intense pressure, he’s been firm in saying that economic data, not political jabs, will guide Fed decisions.

That hasn’t stopped the White House from improvising. The latest idea: appoint a Shadow Chair to publicly counter Powell’s messaging after every Federal Open Market Committee decision. Trump loyalists, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, see this as a way to steer market narratives without technically breaching central bank independence.

Sri-Kumar isn’t convinced it will work. “If the Shadow Chair merely echoes Trump’s demands for drastic rate cuts — especially when economic data, such as the unexpectedly strong 147,000 jobs created in June, argue for caution — markets are likely to view the appointee as a sycophant rather than a credible voice.”

The bigger danger, he says, is damage to institutional credibility. “Volatility in rates markets would push yields even higher, complicating Treasury’s job of financing an ever-larger deficit.” That cycle — higher debt, weaker confidence, rising yields — could dampen business investment and household consumption. “The very growth the White House is trying to juice might instead stall.”

The Fed is staring at a policy contradiction. It can’t lower rates without risking unanchored inflation expectations, particularly in an economy already facing cost pressures from tariffs and wage growth. Yet Trump needs cheaper borrowing to sell his fiscal agenda to both Congress and the public.

Powell, for now, is walking a narrow path. His recent remarks acknowledged that tariffs are likely to raise prices and that the central bank will wait for more clarity. This pragmatic stance contrasts with the political theatre unfolding around him.

Still, pressure is mounting. The Fed’s next moves are being watched not only for their economic implications, but for what they say about the institution’s resilience in the face of political provocation.

Markets, for their part, have yet to fully absorb the standoff. Treasury yields have crept up, but equity markets remain broadly optimistic. Sri-Kumar’s concern is that this optimism may be misplaced. “Without addressing the inflationary impulses built into the administration’s own fiscal and trade policy,” he writes, “the White House risks asking monetary policy to fight against the consequences of its own actions.”

That misalignment may become harder to ignore in the months ahead. If inflation expectations become unanchored and demand for Treasurys softens, the US could face the very scenario it has long believed it was immune to: debt spiralling while credibility erodes.

The message is clear: slogans don’t pay interest, and press conferences don’t anchor bond markets.


Dr Komal Sri-Kumar is the President of Sri-Kumar Global Strategies, Inc., which advises multinational investors and sovereign wealth funds on global risk and opportunity. He is regularly featured on business media and speaks in global financial centres on key economic and geopolitical issues. Quotes in this article are drawn from his weekly newsletter

Support independent community journalism. Support The Indian Sun.


Follow The Indian Sun on X | InstagramFacebook

 

Donate To The Indian Sun

Dear Reader,

The Indian Sun is an independent organisation committed to community journalism. We have, through the years, been able to reach a wide audience especially with the growth of social media, where we also have a strong presence. With platforms such as YouTube videos, we have been able to engage in different forms of storytelling. However, the past few years, like many media organisations around the world, it has not been an easy path. We have a greater challenge. We believe community journalism is very important for a multicultural country like Australia. We’re not able to do everything, but we aim for some of the most interesting stories and journalism of quality. We call upon readers like you to support us and make any contribution. Do make a DONATION NOW so we can continue with the volume and quality journalism that we are able to practice.

Thank you for your support.

Best wishes,
Team The Indian Sun

Comments