Valmik Thapar, who died on 31 May in New Delhi aged 73, was one of India’s most visible and vocal guardians of the tiger. Unlike many who champion wildlife from a distance, Thapar lived within clawing reach. For nearly fifty years, he was a fixture in the scrub and dry deciduous forests of Ranthambore, not as a visitor but as a witness. A witness to birth, death, poaching, bungling bureaucracy, policy inertia, resurgence and sometimes, just silence—of the kind only an apex predator can inspire. To him, the tiger wasn’t a symbol or an allegory. It was a living, breathing beast—sharp-eyed, unpredictable, and worth every minute of protection.
Born in 1952 into one of Delhi’s intellectually plugged-in families, Thapar might easily have become another voice in the drawing-room symposia that his father, the political commentator Romesh Thapar, hosted through the pages of Seminar. His aunt, Romila Thapar, rewrote ancient Indian history. His cousin, Karan, became a famously confrontational television journalist. Valmik, for a while, seemed destined to orbit the same milieu. But something changed in 1976 when he travelled to Ranthambhore and met Fateh Singh Rathore, the park’s legendary field officer. The man handed him a pair of binoculars and a camera, and that was it. Thapar’s allegiance shifted from parliament to the jungle.
He would become one of India’s leading experts on tiger behaviour, having watched and documented the lives of several generations of Ranthambhore’s feline residents. One tigress in particular, Machli, became both muse and metaphor. Cameras, books and tourists loved her. Thapar too, but with less sentiment and more curiosity. He insisted on naming his tigers by numbers first. Machli was T-16 before she was India’s most photographed animal. To Thapar, intimacy came with discipline.
His early work was rooted in the belief that science, local knowledge and rigorous fieldwork could combine to produce better wildlife outcomes. That conviction drove the formation of the Ranthambhore Foundation in 1988, which focused on engaging surrounding communities as partners rather than intruders. Conservation, he believed, had to benefit the human beings who lived on the forest’s edge, not punish them for geography. The results were mixed but earnest—he managed to create a model for collaboration that endured, even if the government machinery didn’t always keep pace.
His written output was enormous. More than 40 books carried his name, including Tiger Fire, The Secret Life of Tigers, and The Illustrated Tigers of India. Few naturalists have managed to document their subject so extensively, and fewer still with such emotional clarity. His prose often read like a field diary soaked in dust and wonder. Tigers, in his telling, were not mythical beings. They mated, limped, parented, fought, and slept. He never romanticised them, nor reduced them to mascots for fundraisers.
He also made television look easy. Land of the Tiger, his 1997 BBC series, remains one of the best introductions to Indian wildlife. His documentaries with Animal Planet, Discovery and National Geographic helped bring the feral grace of India’s jungles into urban living rooms. These weren’t just travelogues for the armchair naturalist—they were pointed, persuasive essays on why nature, when watched closely, demands humility.
Humility, though, was not something Thapar always reserved for people. He frequently clashed with officialdom. As a member of multiple government advisory panels and task forces, he pushed hard for reforms but pulled no punches. He was blunt about the shortcomings of Project Tiger, the flagship conservation scheme launched in 1973. He accused it of being bureaucratic, poorly implemented and averse to transparency. When asked whether India should experiment with the concept of human-tiger coexistence, he was scathing. “You cannot ask a tiger to cohabit with 4,000 people and their livestock and expect success,” he said. His honesty often ruffled feathers, but it also kept the debate honest.
His final years were no less active. He continued to publish, mentor younger conservationists, and appear on camera, his voice deepening but not softening. The 2024 BBC documentary My Tiger Family was, in many ways, his retrospective. It featured five tigresses he had observed over five decades, a quiet farewell delivered in episodes. Watching it now feels like reading a last letter from someone who never left the field.
Valmik Thapar’s death leaves India’s conservation community without one of its most articulate and unflinching voices. But it also forces a reckoning. Few people embodied the transition of tiger conservation from royal pursuit to scientific necessity as fully as he did. He straddled worlds: the elite and the rural, the observational and the operational, the lyrical and the empirical.
He is survived by his wife Sanjana Kapoor, herself part of a cultural dynasty as the daughter of actor Shashi Kapoor, and their son, Hamir. But the legacy that looms largest is not bloodline—it is track line. Deep in Ranthambhore, under the sun-bleached rocks and peepal trees, are the paw prints of tigers that trusted him long enough to be seen.
For Thapar, that was enough. The tiger was always the protagonist. He was just the scribe.
Support independent community journalism. Support The Indian Sun.
Follow The Indian Sun on X | Instagram | Facebook
Support Independent Community Journalism
Dear Reader,The Indian Sun exists for one reason: to tell stories that might otherwise go unheard.
We report on local councils, state politics, small businesses and cultural festivals. We focus on the Indian diaspora and the wider multicultural community with care, balance and accountability. We publish in print and online, send regular newsletters and produce video content. We also run media training programs to help community organisations share their own stories.
We operate independently.
Community journalism does not have the backing of large media corporations. Advertising revenue fluctuates. Platform algorithms change. Costs continue to rise. Yet the need for credible, grounded reporting in a multicultural Australia has never been greater.
When you support The Indian Sun, you support:
• Independent reporting on issues affecting migrant communities
• Coverage of local and state decisions that shape daily life
• A platform for small businesses and community groups
• Media training that builds skills within the community
• Journalism accountable to readers
We cannot cover everything, but we work to cover what matters.
If you value thoughtful reporting that reflects Australia’s diversity, we invite you to contribute. Every donation helps us maintain the quality and consistency of our work.
Please consider making a contribution today.
Thank you for your support.
The Indian Sun Team
