The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has taken a bold stance in confronting the issue of consumer financial hardship. Not only has the watchdog declared its intent to place this issue under the microscope over the next year, but it has also laid out a detailed list of expectations for lenders in a bid to instigate change. This supplements their announcement of increased surveillance on financial institutions to monitor their dealings with consumers facing financial challenges.
In a recent development, ASIC has issued an extensive appendix, called Appendix A, outlining its financial hardship expectations for lenders. This document goes beyond the general stipulations of section 72 of the National Credit Code, offering a nuanced roadmap that all lenders are expected to adhere to.
First and foremost, ASIC urges lenders to be proactive in communicating with consumers about their options should they find themselves in a financial bind. The organisation insists that information about hardship assistance should be readily available and accessible through multiple channels, including telephone and digital contact.
The training of customer-facing staff is another critical area of focus. According to the appendix, these employees should be equipped to identify signs of financial distress in consumers and respond with adequate support measures. This speaks to a more empathetic and consumer-centric approach that goes beyond mere transactional interactions.
But what happens when a consumer steps forward, seeking assistance? ASIC requires that lenders genuinely consider the unique circumstances of each consumer. They are advised against using a one-size-fits-all solution. Tailoring the assistance program to individual needs could involve restructuring loan repayments or offering alternative payment options.
Clarity in communication is non-negotiable. When discussing potential assistance programs or changes to existing credit contracts, lenders must provide detailed information. This includes explaining the short-term and long-term implications of these changes, as well as the ramifications of capitalising interest.
Should a consumer’s request for hardship assistance be declined, ASIC mandates that lenders must offer a written explanation for the refusal. Not only does this ensure transparency, but it also provides consumers with the information needed to make an informed decision about their next steps, including the option to lodge a complaint with the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA).
Ongoing support is also vital. Lenders are expected to maintain contact with consumers throughout the period of assistance, and even after it ends. This aftercare includes reviewing whether further assistance is necessary and outlining the next steps clearly.
Furthermore, ASIC urges lenders to identify consumers who may be exceptionally vulnerable and offer additional layers of support. This could involve having these consumers liaise with specially trained staff or be directed to other external support services.
Notably, the financial regulator calls for lenders to be prepared for an influx of hardship applications by employing flexible staffing models and ensuring they can respond in a timely manner. Lenders should also have proper governance and oversight mechanisms to monitor their adherence to these guidelines.
From a resources standpoint, lenders are urged to invest in systems that will allow them to respond quickly when a consumer reports hardship. This involves a commitment to both short-term and long-term planning, including quality assurance reviews and consumer-focused reporting.
In summary, ASIC’s Appendix A lays down an ambitious, consumer-centric framework that aims to overhaul how financial institutions engage with consumers facing financial hardship. As ASIC proceeds with its year-long focus on this matter, lenders must now align their policies and practices with these guidelines or risk falling foul of the regulator’s expectations.
The ball is now in the court of financial institutions across Australia. With increased scrutiny and a detailed guideline in hand, it remains to be seen if lenders will adjust their sails to better navigate the stormy seas of consumer financial hardship. Will they take heed or find themselves at loggerheads with the watchdog? Only time will tell.
Support independent community journalism. Support The Indian Sun.
Follow The Indian Sun on Twitter | Instagram | Facebook
Support Independent Community Journalism
Dear Reader,The Indian Sun exists for one reason: to tell stories that might otherwise go unheard.
We report on local councils, state politics, small businesses and cultural festivals. We focus on the Indian diaspora and the wider multicultural community with care, balance and accountability. We publish in print and online, send regular newsletters and produce video content. We also run media training programs to help community organisations share their own stories.
We operate independently.
Community journalism does not have the backing of large media corporations. Advertising revenue fluctuates. Platform algorithms change. Costs continue to rise. Yet the need for credible, grounded reporting in a multicultural Australia has never been greater.
When you support The Indian Sun, you support:
• Independent reporting on issues affecting migrant communities
• Coverage of local and state decisions that shape daily life
• A platform for small businesses and community groups
• Media training that builds skills within the community
• Journalism accountable to readers
We cannot cover everything, but we work to cover what matters.
If you value thoughtful reporting that reflects Australia’s diversity, we invite you to contribute. Every donation helps us maintain the quality and consistency of our work.
Please consider making a contribution today.
Thank you for your support.
The Indian Sun Team
