For thirty years, Pauline Hanson’s One Nation has haunted Australian politics from the edges, winning Senate seats, stoking culture wars, and retreating. Tonight that changed. David Farley has won the federal seat of Farrer in regional New South Wales, giving One Nation its first lower house seat since the party was founded in 1997. It is not a footnote. It is a rupture.
Farrer had been in Coalition hands since the seat was created in 1949. Seventy-seven years of safe conservative territory, held most recently by Sussan Ley, who resigned in February 2026 after losing the Liberal leadership to Angus Taylor by 34 votes to 17. That resignation triggered the by-election. What it also triggered, it turns out, was a reckoning that the Liberal and National parties were not remotely prepared for.
Farley’s numbers are brutal in their clarity. He pulled 42 per cent of the primary vote, a swing of 34.8 points toward One Nation. The Liberal candidate Raissa Butkowski finished on 11.5 per cent, a collapse of 31.2 points. The Nationals, running separately in a seat they had previously ceded to the Liberals under the Coalition agreement, managed 9.6 per cent. Between them, the two parties that have owned this corner of regional Australia for three quarters of a century could not scrape together enough votes to matter.
In the two-candidate preferred count, Farley leads independent Michelle Milthorpe 59.4 per cent to 40.6. It is not close.
Political analyst Kos Samaras was watching the numbers come in and did not soften his assessment. “In 2025, urban Australians showed the Liberal Party the door,” he wrote. “Tonight, regional Australians are doing the same.” He described the Coalition campaign in Farrer as “one of the worst I have ever seen, negative, hopeless, and entirely about what Canberra thinks. No hope. It reinforced everything voters have come to despise about this party.”
“One Nation is clearly now the preferred party of small town Australia. Labor the preferred party of big city Australia. Bread crumbs left for what is left of Menzies’ party and yes, the Nationals”
The Coalition’s strategy had been to attack Farley over past reported flirtations with the Labor party, plastering corflutes across the electorate warning voters about his political history. It did not work. As Samaras put it: “Farrer voters saw the attack. Read it. Voted for him anyway.” Tribal loyalty, he argued, no longer holds these communities together. The realignment underway is not between left and right. It is between people who feel heard by the system and people who do not. In Farrer, the second group won decisively.
The internal chaos that created this opening was spectacular even by recent standards. The Liberal and National parties began 2026 by formally breaking up their Coalition, with Nationals leader David Littleproud declaring it “untenable.” Seventeen days later they were back together. The split, the reunion, the leadership change, the Ley resignation, all of it played out in plain sight as Farrer voters watched and drew their own conclusions about which party deserved their trust.
One Nation’s immigration platform calls for capping permanent visas at 130,000 a year, a cut of more than 570,000 from current Labor levels according to their published policy. They want an eight-year citizenship waiting period, a sharp tightening of student visa access, deportation of 75,000 undocumented migrants, and withdrawal from the United Nations Refugee Convention
For the multicultural community, the Farrer result carries consequences that go well beyond a single regional seat.
One Nation’s immigration platform calls for capping permanent visas at 130,000 a year, a cut of more than 570,000 from current Labor levels according to their published policy. They want an eight-year citizenship waiting period, a sharp tightening of student visa access, deportation of 75,000 undocumented migrants, and withdrawal from the United Nations Refugee Convention. Skilled migration pipelines, which have brought hundreds of thousands of Indian workers and their families to Australia over the past two decades, sit squarely in the crosshairs of that agenda.
One Nation has never had a lower house platform from which to push these positions into the daily business of parliament. Now it does. Farley will take his seat in the House of Representatives and bring with him a mandate from regional Australia that no serious political party can afford to ignore. The pressure on both major parties to harden their immigration rhetoric, to chase the Farrer voter rather than the multicultural city voter, will not decrease.
The pressure on both major parties to harden their immigration rhetoric, to chase the Farrer voter rather than the multicultural city voter, will not decrease
The Coalition faces a specific crisis. Samaras’s conclusion is pointed: “One Nation is clearly now the preferred party of small town Australia. Labor the preferred party of big city Australia. Bread crumbs left for what is left of Menzies’ party and yes, the Nationals.” A party that cannot hold its own base in a seat it has owned for 77 years, against a candidate they tried to disqualify on ideological grounds, is a party without a coherent identity. The attempt to simultaneously appeal to One Nation voters on immigration while attacking One Nation’s candidate as impure failed because the logic was incoherent. Voters noticed.
For Labor, the result offers a different kind of warning. The disaffection driving regional Australians toward Farley is real. Cost of living, housing, the sense that government decisions happen somewhere far away by people who do not know what their lives look like, these are not One Nation inventions. They are genuine. A government that treats Farrer as somebody else’s problem does so at its own risk.
What happened tonight in a regional NSW seat that most Australians could not locate on a map will be studied for years. Not because One Nation winning one by-election changes everything, but because of what it reveals about where the cracks in Australian politics actually run. They run deeper than anyone in Canberra was willing to admit.
Pauline Hanson has been trying to get here since 1997. She finally has.
Support independent community journalism. Support The Indian Sun.
Follow The Indian Sun on X | Instagram | Facebook
Support Independent Community Journalism
Dear Reader,The Indian Sun exists for one reason: to tell stories that might otherwise go unheard.
We report on local councils, state politics, small businesses and cultural festivals. We focus on the Indian diaspora and the wider multicultural community with care, balance and accountability. We publish in print and online, send regular newsletters and produce video content. We also run media training programs to help community organisations share their own stories.
We operate independently.
Community journalism does not have the backing of large media corporations. Advertising revenue fluctuates. Platform algorithms change. Costs continue to rise. Yet the need for credible, grounded reporting in a multicultural Australia has never been greater.
When you support The Indian Sun, you support:
• Independent reporting on issues affecting migrant communities
• Coverage of local and state decisions that shape daily life
• A platform for small businesses and community groups
• Media training that builds skills within the community
• Journalism accountable to readers
We cannot cover everything, but we work to cover what matters.
If you value thoughtful reporting that reflects Australia’s diversity, we invite you to contribute. Every donation helps us maintain the quality and consistency of our work.
Please consider making a contribution today.
Thank you for your support.
The Indian Sun Team
