Australians with private health cover are confronting steep jumps in out-of-pocket bills for common hospital procedures, with new data showing some specialist fees have multiplied several times in five years. Private Healthcare Australia (PHA) says the trend is pushing patients into delays, debt, or the public queue.
Between 2018–19 and 2023–24, median medical gap fees charged by surgeons, anaesthetists and assistant surgeons rose sharply across a range of operations. Deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson’s disease is now carrying a median gap of $6,000, up from $790. Biliopancreatic diversion for major weight loss has climbed from $650 to $5,650. A double knee replacement has more than doubled from $1,910 to $4,750. The typical bill for kidney removal due to a tumour has tripled from $1,110 to $3,510. Prostate surgery has jumped from $1,830 to $3,900. Spinal fusion has risen from $700 to $2,640. These are median figures, so many patients will encounter higher charges depending on the doctor, hospital, and complexity.
Regulator numbers point the same way. According to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, average out-of-pocket fees for hospital episodes have increased by 65 per cent since 2020. That pace is faster than wages and general inflation over the period, which helps explain the growing pressure on household budgets.
“Australians deserve access to quality care without being priced out,” said Private Healthcare Australia CEO, Dr Rachel David.
“Doctors are entitled to charge fairly, but fees that double, triple and increase up to nine times in a few years are unsustainable. Patients end up facing massive bills or waiting years for treatment in the public system. Neither Medicare nor private health insurers can keep pace without pushing up taxes and premiums.”
PHA points to a widening affordability gap long before a patient reaches theatre. Health insurers cannot cover appointments with specialists outside a hospital, which means an initial consult can cost hundreds of dollars upfront. For some complex cases, the first appointment can be close to $1,000 before any tests, referrals or pre-operative work. Only after that stage does hospital cover begin to help, and even then, specialist medical fees can leave large gaps.
The behaviour shifts are already showing up in national surveys. Studies by the Australian Bureau of Statistics, La Trobe University and Patients Australia suggest up to one in five Australians is delaying or skipping specialist appointments due to cost. The Grattan Institute estimates that each year more than a million people miss out on seeing a specialist because they cannot afford the visit. Those who proceed often face a chain of bills: surgeon, anaesthetist, assistant surgeon, imaging, pathology, and sometimes device costs that include extra fees.
The Health Minister, Mark Butler, has flagged transparency and competition as levers to ease the squeeze. He has committed to publishing fees for more than 11,000 doctors on the Medical Costs Finder so consumers can compare charges. Other changes on the table include encouraging more doctors to practise in areas with long waits, allowing GP referrals that are not directed to a named specialist so patients can shop around, and automating referrals so GPs can display options and follow up if a patient does not attend. There is active discussion about expanding the roles of nurse practitioners, midwives and allied health to improve access, tightening compliance with the Medicare Benefits Schedule, strengthening penalties for inappropriate billing, and requiring upfront quotes that include every medical provider involved in a private procedure, including the anaesthetist and any assistant surgeon.
For privately insured patients, the fee spike cuts two ways. On the one hand, private cover still buys shorter waits for many procedures and the ability to choose a doctor. On the other, the rise in medical gaps means the predictability that insurance promises is eroding. Many families now try to budget for an excess, an anaesthetist fee, and a surgeon’s gap, only to be surprised by an assistant fee or a device-related charge that was not made clear at the start. PHA argues the fix begins with clear quotes that bundle every doctor’s fee in writing before a booking is made, then allowing patients to compare like for like.
Some of the price pressure reflects broader costs in the health system, including higher wages, insurance, and practice expenses. Specialists say case complexity can vary widely, and in some fields the Medicare rebate structure has not kept pace with modern techniques or the time required to manage complications. Those realities do not offer much relief to a family who has paid premiums for years yet still faces a five-figure bill once hospital, specialist and device costs are combined.
The equity dimension is hard to ignore. When a double knee replacement attracts a median gap of $4,750, lower-income patients are more likely to delay surgery, opt for one knee at a time, or fall back on the public queue. For conditions like spinal issues or prostate disease, postponement can mean more pain, reduced mobility, time away from work, and in some cases, poorer clinical outcomes. The knock-on effects spill into the public system through longer waiting lists and higher downstream costs when conditions worsen.
There is no single fix on offer, but transparency and choice are the themes uniting the suggested reforms. Publishing specialist fees would lift the lid on price variation, which is often wide within the same city. Un-named GP referrals would let patients choose a lower-cost specialist without returning to their GP for fresh paperwork. Automated referrals would make those options visible at the point of care. Expanded roles for nurse practitioners and allied health could absorb routine care and free up specialist time for complex surgery. Stronger compliance would target the minority whose billing practices fall outside the rules. Most of all, standardised upfront quotes that include every provider in theatre would prevent surprise charges after discharge.
Support independent community journalism. Support The Indian Sun.
Follow The Indian Sun on X | Instagram | Facebook
Support Independent Community Journalism
Dear Reader,The Indian Sun exists for one reason: to tell stories that might otherwise go unheard.
We report on local councils, state politics, small businesses and cultural festivals. We focus on the Indian diaspora and the wider multicultural community with care, balance and accountability. We publish in print and online, send regular newsletters and produce video content. We also run media training programs to help community organisations share their own stories.
We operate independently.
Community journalism does not have the backing of large media corporations. Advertising revenue fluctuates. Platform algorithms change. Costs continue to rise. Yet the need for credible, grounded reporting in a multicultural Australia has never been greater.
When you support The Indian Sun, you support:
• Independent reporting on issues affecting migrant communities
• Coverage of local and state decisions that shape daily life
• A platform for small businesses and community groups
• Media training that builds skills within the community
• Journalism accountable to readers
We cannot cover everything, but we work to cover what matters.
If you value thoughtful reporting that reflects Australia’s diversity, we invite you to contribute. Every donation helps us maintain the quality and consistency of our work.
Please consider making a contribution today.
Thank you for your support.
The Indian Sun Team
