Congressman Brandon Gill’s commentary on how a man should eat his rice has sparked something deeper than the usual Twitter (X) outrage cycle. When he declared that eating with one’s hands is uncivilised and suggested those who do so belong in the “Third World,” he opened up a fault line through his own marriage, his party’s cultural posture, and the modern American identity crisis.
The trigger was a video of Zohran Mamdani, a New York mayoral candidate of South Asian descent, calmly scooping dal and rice with his fingers during an interview. An everyday act for millions across India, the Middle East, Africa, and yes, parts of America, was suddenly framed as un-American. Gill, who represents Texas’s 26th District, posted the clip with the caption: “Civilised people in America don’t eat like this. If you refuse to adopt Western customs, go back to the Third World.”
The criticism was immediate, widespread, and came from more than one direction. On the face of it, the comment was textbook cultural chauvinism. But the added twist came from the Congressman’s own household. His wife, Danielle D’Souza Gill, is the daughter of Indian-born conservative commentator Dinesh D’Souza. She defended her husband by posting, “I did not grow up eating rice with my hands and have always used a fork. I was born in America. I’m a Christian MAGA patriot.” She added that her father’s extended family in India also use forks.
That did not settle the debate. If anything, it poured ghee on the fire.
According to KarthikForTexas, a clean energy advocate and former teacher turned grassroots campaigner, “Your wife is South Indian. She grew up eating rice with her hands. You’re literally marrying into it.” Another user posted a photo of Dinesh D’Souza himself eating with his hands. The post went viral.
It was not just progressives who saw the irony. Critics across the spectrum questioned why cultural practices like eating with one’s hands—done daily by millions, including in homes across Texas—should be singled out for mockery, especially by someone whose own family tree includes them.
Corey Saylor from the Council on American-Islamic Relations told Newsweek, “Americans eat pizza, hot dogs, chicken, french fries, burgers, sandwiches, chips, tacos, fruit, nachos, cookies and various other foods with their hands. Those same Americans can see through the hysterical racism and Islamophobia spewed by the likes of Laura Loomer and Texas Congressman Gill.”
Danielle’s use of phrases like “Christian MAGA patriot” did not go unnoticed. While some praised her for taking pride in her American upbringing, others saw it as a deliberate distancing from her Indian heritage—one that seemed tailored for the political base her husband was addressing.
It wasn’t just Danielle’s phrasing that raised eyebrows. The claim that her father’s extended Indian family uses forks exclusively invited mockery. KarthikForTexas retorted, “Were they in the employment of the British royal family?”
It’s not the first time Brandon Gill has taken a swipe at immigrants or multiculturalism. Just a few weeks earlier, he had posted a split-screen comparison of California in the 1960s and today, blaming “mass migration” for social decline. The fact that his wife is the daughter of an Indian immigrant didn’t appear to check his rhetoric. It may even, some suggest, help shield it, a sort of pre-emptive defence.
Danielle’s father Dinesh D’Souza has long held similarly contradictory positions. An outspoken opponent of multiculturalism, he once argued that assimilation into Western values was the only path to preserving American greatness, even as he embodied an immigrant success story.
That contradiction seems to run in the family. According to public records and social media posts, Danielle and Brandon Gill have lived in Flower Mound, Texas, since 2017. Their wedding photos, some of which still float online, reflect a classic American Christian ceremony. Yet the subtext of this debate isn’t about how one couple balances personal and cultural identities—it’s about who gets to define what counts as civilised.
The average American eats dozens of foods with their hands. Burritos, ribs, donuts, wings, corn on the cob, and even sushi when chopsticks are unavailable. Yet there’s rarely an uproar. So why the rice?
Anthropologist Krishnendu Ray, in The Ethnic Restaurateur, traces how the West has long had a hierarchy of eating habits. Foods eaten with forks and knives are considered refined. Finger foods are acceptable when they’re Western. When they come from elsewhere, especially brown or black cultures, they are painted as unsanitary, barbaric, or backward.
What’s happening here isn’t new, but the virality of the debate exposes a more uncomfortable truth. Eating with hands has become a proxy for political purity tests in America. Are you with the multiculturalists, or with the flag-waving purists?
Meanwhile, Mamdani, the man who was eating rice with his hands during the original video, has stayed largely silent. His campaign has continued, unfazed by the uproar. The video wasn’t staged. It wasn’t a cultural statement. It was a meal.
That ordinariness may be the point. The image of a man casually eating rice and dal with his hands wasn’t offensive until someone framed it that way. Gill’s reaction didn’t reflect a real threat to American culture, just a carefully chosen moment to rile up a base conditioned to see difference as danger.
And yet, it’s a risky play. America’s demographics are shifting. According to Pew Research, around 14 percent of Americans identify as Asian or Hispanic—many of whom regularly eat with their hands in private or at community events. The idea that one method of eating is inherently better doesn’t just feel outdated, it feels petty.
In the end, the debate has become a kind of litmus test for how comfortable Americans are with ambiguity. Can a woman of Indian heritage use a fork and still be Indian? Can a Congressman be married to an immigrant’s daughter and still talk about deporting those who don’t “assimilate”? Can eating rice with your fingers be both practical and symbolic without being weaponised?
This is not about hygiene. And it is not even really about food. It’s about the politics of performance, of choosing forks to signal superiority or fingers to assert authenticity. Both sides may be eating the same rice. They’re just using different utensils to make their point.
Support independent community journalism. Support The Indian Sun.
Follow The Indian Sun on X | Instagram | Facebook
Support Independent Community Journalism
Dear Reader,The Indian Sun exists for one reason: to tell stories that might otherwise go unheard.
We report on local councils, state politics, small businesses and cultural festivals. We focus on the Indian diaspora and the wider multicultural community with care, balance and accountability. We publish in print and online, send regular newsletters and produce video content. We also run media training programs to help community organisations share their own stories.
We operate independently.
Community journalism does not have the backing of large media corporations. Advertising revenue fluctuates. Platform algorithms change. Costs continue to rise. Yet the need for credible, grounded reporting in a multicultural Australia has never been greater.
When you support The Indian Sun, you support:
• Independent reporting on issues affecting migrant communities
• Coverage of local and state decisions that shape daily life
• A platform for small businesses and community groups
• Media training that builds skills within the community
• Journalism accountable to readers
We cannot cover everything, but we work to cover what matters.
If you value thoughtful reporting that reflects Australia’s diversity, we invite you to contribute. Every donation helps us maintain the quality and consistency of our work.
Please consider making a contribution today.
Thank you for your support.
The Indian Sun Team
