Philip Soos lit the match. A political observer, associated with nationalist circles, posted a chart from the Carnegie Endowment’s 2022 survey, highlighting that a majority of Indo-Australian respondents felt a stronger alignment with the Labor Party. Soos didn’t leave much room for nuance. “This is why Labor is pouring in the Indians,” he wrote, “It’s about demographic change to entrench a permanent Labor voting block.”
The phrase “pouring in the Indians” was provocative enough, but the chart did the heavy lifting. It suggested that 58% of Indo-Australians felt closer to the ALP, while only 24% aligned with the Coalition. It wasn’t a hot take—it was a data-backed political inference. But it became a political Molotov cocktail when strategist Kos Samaras, never one to let a moment pass quietly, quote-tweeted the post with a sharp retort:
“This is why conservatives have a problem with diverse communities in this country. Communities who actually harbour conservative values, like wealth accumulation, social conservatism etc. All that gets washed away – summed up by the words of one Indian Australian in our research: ‘They just don’t like people like me.’”
And there it was. Not from a party insider, but from a voter. Six words that said everything.
The timing couldn’t have been better—or worse—depending on which side you’re on. Australia had just wrapped up its 2025 federal election. Anthony Albanese had led Labor to a thumping win over Peter Dutton’s Coalition, sweeping urban electorates with large migrant populations. Wikipedia called it a “landslide defeat” for the Liberals. ABC’s Antony Green’s numbers told a similar story: Labor surged where multicultural Australia lived, worked, and voted. Soos’s post, followed by Samaras’s commentary, made it clear that these weren’t just trends—they were political realignments with consequences.
The Carnegie data, conducted in collaboration with Johns Hopkins and YouGov, had flagged the shift two years prior. Indo-Australian voters—especially new arrivals—were nearly twice as likely to support Labor (45%) than the Coalition (23%). The authors warned that neither side could afford complacency. But Labor, at least this time, had done something with the warning. Albanese’s language throughout the campaign was steady: “No one will be left behind.”
The Coalition had a different problem—one that has trailed it for years. It was never just policy; it was tone. Samaras’s quote—“They just don’t like people like me”—echoed in hundreds of comments that followed. Some saw it as victimhood politics. Others saw it as a summary of every encounter where culture, religion, or surname became a filter for suspicion.
But the replies weren’t uniform. One user, Live the Dream8, fired back: “I think you are confusing ‘diverse communities’ with ‘immigration on steroids’. The latter is opposed by many conservative people and has resulted in a terrible housing crisis.” This reflected a wider concern that the Coalition had tried and failed to weaponise: the idea that immigration is fuelling Australia’s housing crunch. Aunty Neville went further, citing the oft-repeated figure of “1.2 million immigrants in three years,” pinning the crisis on open borders. The problem was that Labor had maintained high intake numbers too—and yet, those angry about it weren’t necessarily swinging to the Coalition.
An ABC article from May 11 tried to unpack the contradiction. One small business owner, Anu Bedi, described herself as a traditional Liberal voter drawn to tax cuts and deregulation. But another voter, Akshay, said simply, “The Labor Party best represented and respected migrants.” That word—respected—cut to the heart of it.
On the Coalition side, there were own goals. One X user referenced Peter Dutton’s 2023 comments implying migrants could be spies, and another pointed to pre-election accusations that local councils were being manipulated via citizenship ceremonies. These weren’t fringe theories; they were moments that got airtime. And they added up.
A user posting as Colleen Brady took a blunt stance: “Indian Australian. Therein lies the problem. You’re either Australian or Indian.” But that line of thinking ignores how most migrants actually live—with layered identities and multiple affiliations. A user named Deus_Vult_Oz, who also identified as Indian, responded: “Personally, I just don’t like them (Liberals). If I wanted to join them they’d willingly take anyone’s money.” Another replied, dismissively: “They vote Labor because Labor is a bulk immigration party.”
Samaras, for his part, remained direct. When a commenter tried to argue that the thread disproved the theory that all immigrants lean Left, he replied, “Brain dead theory – literally.” His biography provides context. Born to Greek migrants, he grew up handing out how-to-vote cards in suburban Melbourne before climbing Labor’s ranks and eventually founding RedBridge, a consultancy that has helped decode voter behaviour for years. He knows numbers. He also knows people.
The 2025 result vindicated his analysis. Labor’s win in electorates like Parramatta, Greenway, and Wills wasn’t just about promises—it was about presence. Albanese’s team showed up, again and again, in communities the Coalition either ignored or misread.
But the idea that Labor has this vote locked is dangerous. The Carnegie report warned as much. Voter loyalty is transactional. Migrant communities care about housing, education, and stability—just like everyone else. If Labor falters, it may find those same votes disappear.
Soos’s post was intended as an alarm. Samaras turned it into a mirror. And what it reflected back was uncomfortable: conservative values aren’t enough if you’re not seen as belonging. Voters may nod along with economic policy, but they won’t back a party that treats them as outsiders.
Support independent community journalism. Support The Indian Sun.
Follow The Indian Sun on X | Instagram | Facebook
Support Independent Community Journalism
Dear Reader,The Indian Sun exists for one reason: to tell stories that might otherwise go unheard.
We report on local councils, state politics, small businesses and cultural festivals. We focus on the Indian diaspora and the wider multicultural community with care, balance and accountability. We publish in print and online, send regular newsletters and produce video content. We also run media training programs to help community organisations share their own stories.
We operate independently.
Community journalism does not have the backing of large media corporations. Advertising revenue fluctuates. Platform algorithms change. Costs continue to rise. Yet the need for credible, grounded reporting in a multicultural Australia has never been greater.
When you support The Indian Sun, you support:
• Independent reporting on issues affecting migrant communities
• Coverage of local and state decisions that shape daily life
• A platform for small businesses and community groups
• Media training that builds skills within the community
• Journalism accountable to readers
We cannot cover everything, but we work to cover what matters.
If you value thoughtful reporting that reflects Australia’s diversity, we invite you to contribute. Every donation helps us maintain the quality and consistency of our work.
Please consider making a contribution today.
Thank you for your support.
The Indian Sun Team
