Despite dealing heavy blows to terror networks and asserting its strategic dominance with clarity and restraint, India remains calm. It does not burst crackers after every operation, nor does it parade its might through chest-thumping pressers. Real power has nothing to prove. Meanwhile, Pakistan responds to humiliation with celebration. Dancing in the streets after suffering military setbacks and diplomatic isolation isn’t patriotism—it’s delusion. The contrast could not be starker. On one side, a responsible power acting with resolve. On the other, a state spiralling into irrelevance, kept afloat by bailouts, borrowed time, and lies told so often they’re now memorised.
Pakistan’s track record on terror is not incidental—it is systemic. It didn’t stumble into extremism; it chose it. Its intelligence agencies have for decades provided shelter, training, and strategy to global terror outfits. The Taliban’s safe houses, the Lashkar camps, the Jaish recruitment cells—each had the quiet approval of the establishment in Rawalpindi. In 2011, the world learned what many already suspected. Osama bin Laden, the mastermind of 9/11, was living undisturbed in Abbottabad, just down the road from a military academy. The Americans stormed in and executed the operation. Pakistan neither saw it coming nor offered resistance. It was either complicit or clueless. There is no third option.
That wasn’t the exception. Hafiz Saeed, the architect of the Mumbai attacks, moved freely under state protection for years. Masood Azhar is shielded to this day. These are not loose cannons operating in the shadows. They are state assets, nurtured and protected for use in asymmetric warfare against India. Pakistan still tells the world it is a victim of terror. It might be. But only in the way Frankenstein is a victim of his own creation.
India, by contrast, has responded with discipline. When provoked, it does not descend into chaos. It calculates. The 2016 surgical strikes after Uri, and the 2019 airstrikes on Balakot, weren’t acts of aggression—they were acts of warning. The message was simple: India will not be provoked into war, but nor will it tolerate the slow bleed of terrorism. These strikes were not reckless airshows. They were targeted, timed, and tactical. No civilian casualties. No bombing for optics. Just precision work backed by real intelligence.
And still, despite these carefully executed responses, the Indian public remains impatient. Decades of being at the receiving end of cross-border terrorism have left scars and expectations. Every strike is seen as necessary, but never final. The public understands that removing camps is not the same as removing the ideology. The source remains intact, funded and fuelled by a neighbour in decline.
Yet, even as Pakistan’s assets are neutralised, its economy wobbles, and its credibility is in tatters, the country breaks into celebration. Its media, deeply intertwined with its military, crafts alternative histories. Defeats are rewritten as brave resistance. Victories are manufactured. Social media bursts with hashtags about survival, as if not being wiped off the map is now a badge of honour. It’s the behaviour of a regime that confuses endurance with excellence.
India builds, Pakistan blames. One sends missions to the moon, the other can’t keep the lights on. One debates global AI governance, the other begs for funds to avoid default. Even countries that once supported Pakistan have grown weary. It has outlived its utility and lost its script. Meanwhile, India, with its economic heft, diplomatic voice, and military restraint, is slowly shaping the conversation in global capitals.
India doesn’t run public campaigns when it eliminates a terrorist. It confirms, moves on, and recalibrates. The world takes notice—quietly, respectfully. Pakistan, on the other hand, runs laps around media studios whenever it believes it has “resisted” an Indian operation. Never mind that the resistance exists only in headlines written by generals-turned-journalists. Survival, for Islamabad, has become the last remaining achievement.
What’s perhaps most galling is that Pakistan still considers itself an equal in this contest. Even after losing territory, narrative, and trust, it pretends parity. But there is no contest. One is an emerging superpower grounded in democratic values. The other is a rent-seeking state with nuclear weapons and no control over what happens inside its borders.
Power doesn’t scream. It acts. Propaganda, on the other hand, fills the silence of failure. Pakistan may fool itself, but the region sees the difference. India speaks less and delivers more. That’s the new order. And no hashtag, no parade, and no denial can rewrite it.
Support independent community journalism. Support The Indian Sun.
Follow The Indian Sun on X | Instagram | Facebook
Donate To The Indian Sun
Dear Reader,The Indian Sun is an independent organisation committed to community journalism. We have, through the years, been able to reach a wide audience especially with the growth of social media, where we also have a strong presence. With platforms such as YouTube videos, we have been able to engage in different forms of storytelling. However, the past few years, like many media organisations around the world, it has not been an easy path. We have a greater challenge. We believe community journalism is very important for a multicultural country like Australia. We’re not able to do everything, but we aim for some of the most interesting stories and journalism of quality. We call upon readers like you to support us and make any contribution. Do make a DONATION NOW so we can continue with the volume and quality journalism that we are able to practice.
Thank you for your support.
Best wishes,
Team The Indian Sun
