The map of Chisholm is a familiar one to Victorian political operatives: a strip of Melbourne’s eastern suburbs winding through Box Hill, Burwood, and Glen Waverley, dense with shopping centres, temple bells, and language schools. On paper, it looks like any middle-ring metro electorate. On the ground, it’s an electoral hybrid of another kind—without saying the word. One in seven here were born in China. One in twenty were Indian born. Sri Lanka, Malaysia, Hong Kong—each has left fingerprints on this seat, and each will shape its outcome.
The 2025 federal election returns Chisholm to its default status: contested. At the last ballot, Labor’s Carina Garland captured the seat on the back of a 6.86% swing. She walked into Canberra with a healthy 56.41% of the two-party preferred vote. But a redistribution trimmed the comfort. Her margin is now 3.2%. This contest, as ever, will be close.
It’s the kind of seat where candidates walk rather than drive. Garland, the incumbent, is pitching heavily to infrastructure and public health investments. She has favoured public commitments around Glen Waverley’s Kingsway redevelopment, and has been active on the ground. Door-knocking, forums, parent meet-ups—her office has been ticking boxes with administrative discipline. Whether that converts to votes remains to be seen.
Running against her is Katie Allen, formerly the member for Higgins before it was absorbed by redistribution. Allen brings a practised familiarity to economic themes. Her messaging is neat: jobs, families, growth. The kind of economic conservatism that middle-class voters in Chisholm have historically embraced. But Higgins is not Chisholm. And while Allen’s campaign has ramped up activity—weekly stalls, Facebook live streams, regular appearances—she is facing a culturally complex, generationally younger electorate than the one she last represented.
The third visible presence belongs to the Greens’ Tim Randall. Randall is aiming to consolidate the progressive vote, particularly among the younger Chinese and South Asian Australians concerned with climate, housing, and education. His campaign posters—green ink on white fences—have become familiar across parts of Ashwood and Box Hill. In the local WhatsApp groups frequented by community activists, his name turns up more than once.
But the Greens are not alone in disrupting traditional lines. Kath Davies, an independent with a background in community organising, is working the transparency angle. Her campaign is low-budget but local. Christine McShane, standing under the “Trumpet of Patriots” banner, appeals to a pocket of disaffection—less visible, but vocal in the comments sections. Guy Livori, a business-first independent, and Gary Ong, a pro-education candidate running under Family First, add further texture.
Each of these candidates has a narrow lane. None can afford to slip.
Census data gives Chisholm its distinct character. Nearly 60% of residents have at least one parent born overseas. Mandarin, Cantonese, Tamil, Hindi—they’re all spoken at kitchen tables. Religion, too, cuts differently here. Hinduism sits at 6.4%, Buddhism at 7.5%, Christianity around 40%—a microcosm of Australia’s multicultural future, already playing out in the east. That reality makes the voter conversation more layered than elsewhere. Political messages pass through filters of language, religion, first-generation anxiety, and aspirational pressure. Nothing is assumed. Everything must be explained.
Voter turnout in 2022 was solid, and the informal vote rate stood at 4.5%—a touch above the national average, but not wildly so. It reflects an electorate that engages, even if not always conventionally. Early voting trends from local pre polls suggest more of the same this year: higher early turnout, longer lines, and an electorate eager to decide early and decisively.
The topics that dominate? Kingsway’s funding, to begin with. The Glen Waverley strip is a small but potent symbol. Which candidate will get it done faster, cleaner, and with fewer delays? Then there’s climate policy—more than symbolic in an area with a high proportion of educated, globally engaged voters. And cost of living. That, too, rings loud. Particularly among first-home buyers, who make up a growing slice of the resident profile.
Sentiment online has been split. Threads on WeChat and Indian-Australian Facebook groups point to cautious optimism around Labor’s handling of local services, and growing frustration with housing affordability. On Reddit, Garland gets both credit and critique. Allen’s name is well known, but not always for this seat. Randall appears to be gaining traction among first-time voters and university communities.
The arithmetic is tight. In 2022, Garland’s win was built on a national swing, Labor’s unified messaging, and a disengaged Liberal base. That dynamic no longer applies. Anthony Albanese’s incumbency is no longer fresh. Voter expectations have recalibrated. The margin has narrowed. The conversation has changed.
Chisholm is rarely dull. In 2019, it was the only seat Labor took from the Coalition in Victoria. In 2022, it flipped red on a wave. In 2025, it is once again a measuring stick—not just for party momentum, but for who speaks more fluently to modern Australia. With seven candidates on the ballot, and no shortage of micro-targeting, the real contest lies in how effectively each one understands the local grammar.
The numbers will come soon enough. What’s less clear, at this point, is which voice will match the electorate’s frequency.
Support independent community journalism. Support The Indian Sun.
Follow The Indian Sun on X | Instagram | Facebook
Support Independent Community Journalism
Dear Reader,The Indian Sun exists for one reason: to tell stories that might otherwise go unheard.
We report on local councils, state politics, small businesses and cultural festivals. We focus on the Indian diaspora and the wider multicultural community with care, balance and accountability. We publish in print and online, send regular newsletters and produce video content. We also run media training programs to help community organisations share their own stories.
We operate independently.
Community journalism does not have the backing of large media corporations. Advertising revenue fluctuates. Platform algorithms change. Costs continue to rise. Yet the need for credible, grounded reporting in a multicultural Australia has never been greater.
When you support The Indian Sun, you support:
• Independent reporting on issues affecting migrant communities
• Coverage of local and state decisions that shape daily life
• A platform for small businesses and community groups
• Media training that builds skills within the community
• Journalism accountable to readers
We cannot cover everything, but we work to cover what matters.
If you value thoughtful reporting that reflects Australia’s diversity, we invite you to contribute. Every donation helps us maintain the quality and consistency of our work.
Please consider making a contribution today.
Thank you for your support.
The Indian Sun Team
