Jagajaga, a federal seat located in Melbourne’s north-eastern arc, offers a useful case study of suburban electoral stability meeting demographic transition. Created in 1984 and held by the Labor Party ever since, the division is once again drawing attention—not for a likely swing, but for what it reveals about the shape of modern Australian electorates.
The electorate spans Ivanhoe, Heidelberg, Eltham, Greensborough, and Watsonia—suburbs with a reputation for leafy streets, relatively high educational attainment, and increasingly complex household economics. The median age is 40, and more than 40% of residents hold a university degree. Median weekly household income sits around $2,000. It is a seat defined less by volatility and more by gradual shifts—demographic, generational, and cultural.
Kate Thwaites, the incumbent Labor MP, goes into the 2025 election with a comfortable margin, having secured 62.35% of the two-candidate preferred vote in 2022. However, the field of seven candidates this year reflects a widening political spectrum and a growing contest over how best to represent an electorate that is more multilingual, more digitally active, and more focused on housing and infrastructure pressures than at any point in the last decade.
Seven candidates have put their hands up this time. Incumbent Labor MP Kate Thwaites returns, first elected in 2019. Her focus has been healthcare, climate policy, and early education. She’s up against Liberal candidate Chris Parr, a local businessman with a message centred on roads, jobs, and small business growth. Jy Sandford is standing for the Greens with a campaign focused on climate resilience and social equity. Chris Kearney, an independent, has built a reputation for pushing hard on campaign finance reform and local consultation. There’s also Rae Rancie from Family First, One Nation’s Leslie Ralph, and Abdi Mohamed, an independent advocating for inclusive representation.
The numbers from 2022 are telling. Thwaites won 40.9% of first-preference votes, finishing with 62.35% after preferences—more than a 6% swing to Labor. The turnout was 90.5%, with informal votes making up about 5.3% of ballots. This year, polling forecasts give Thwaites a 95.8% chance of retaining the seat, though preferences may tell a more complex story.
Social media tells its own version. Thwaites and Kearney both have strong digital footprints, sharing regular updates and tapping into community sentiment. Sandford has been visible across university campuses and local youth groups, with a steady online campaign built on climate language and student outreach. Parr, by contrast, has stuck to traditional avenues—letterboxing, small events, and local media. Mohamed’s presence is building slowly, especially among first-time voters.
Housing is a pressing issue. Across suburbs like Watsonia and Heidelberg Heights, rental stress is rising. Verified online posts and council reports show some neighbourhoods where more than 30% of households are paying over a third of their income in rent. Younger voters, migrants, and low-income earners feel it most acutely. Campaigns that fail to address this directly tend not to gain traction.
Infrastructure comes up almost as frequently. Whether it’s the long-promised duplication of Rosanna Road or train frequency on the Hurstbridge line, voters want movement on local transport. In some pockets, education spending and healthcare access remain key issues, particularly for families balancing aged care and school-age kids.
Multiculturalism in Jagajaga is real, though rarely flashy. More than 30% of residents were born overseas, and over 25% speak a language other than English at home. Mandarin, Hindi, Greek, Vietnamese, and Italian top the list. In suburbs like Heidelberg West and Macleod, community halls host everything from Diwali celebrations to English classes. But political engagement from these groups varies. Some are highly organised, others remain underrepresented.
Candidates have tried to respond. Thwaites has a track record of attending cultural events and working with groups on language access and health equity. Kearney has resonated with progressive migrants seeking change beyond party lines. Parr has focused his economic message on migrant-owned businesses in Greensborough and Ivanhoe. Sandford has made inroads with international students and young professionals.
Mohamed, the independent candidate of Somali heritage, is perhaps the most direct reflection of Jagajaga’s evolving story. His platform speaks to lived experience: navigating housing applications, seeking meaningful work with overseas qualifications, and raising kids in a suburb where school catchments can make or break futures.
Still, not every campaign message is landing. One Nation and Family First appear to have minimal traction in the area’s multicultural heartlands. Their platforms—framed around national security and traditional values—haven’t gained visibility in communities where the pressing concerns are usually practical: rent, education, healthcare, and employment pathways.
Political memory matters too. Migrant communities often vote based on who shows up—not just during election month, but year after year. That institutional presence can’t be mimicked with a flyer. Local temples, Islamic centres, and cultural associations quietly carry electoral influence, helping members interpret policy platforms and organise around shared needs.
Jagajaga’s voters don’t swing on spectacle. The electorate tends to favour the practical over the performative. But there’s movement beneath the surface. As more migrants gain voting power, as younger voters enter the fold, and as political loyalty softens, the calculus changes. Preferences matter. So does trust.
Election day might not bring fireworks in this seat, but it will send a message about what kind of politics people in the suburbs now expect—quietly demanding, informed, and less predictable than the party strategists might like. In Jagajaga, the quiet majority is watching. And this time, its voice might be just a little harder to forecast.
Support independent community journalism. Support The Indian Sun.
Follow The Indian Sun on X | Instagram | Facebook
Support Independent Community Journalism
Dear Reader,The Indian Sun exists for one reason: to tell stories that might otherwise go unheard.
We report on local councils, state politics, small businesses and cultural festivals. We focus on the Indian diaspora and the wider multicultural community with care, balance and accountability. We publish in print and online, send regular newsletters and produce video content. We also run media training programs to help community organisations share their own stories.
We operate independently.
Community journalism does not have the backing of large media corporations. Advertising revenue fluctuates. Platform algorithms change. Costs continue to rise. Yet the need for credible, grounded reporting in a multicultural Australia has never been greater.
When you support The Indian Sun, you support:
• Independent reporting on issues affecting migrant communities
• Coverage of local and state decisions that shape daily life
• A platform for small businesses and community groups
• Media training that builds skills within the community
• Journalism accountable to readers
We cannot cover everything, but we work to cover what matters.
If you value thoughtful reporting that reflects Australia’s diversity, we invite you to contribute. Every donation helps us maintain the quality and consistency of our work.
Please consider making a contribution today.
Thank you for your support.
The Indian Sun Team
