South Australia is at a crossroads in housing policy as its population dynamics continue to evolve. With an ageing population and a significant projected rise in single-parent households, the state government is seeking public feedback on proposed changes to its planning rules. The Accommodation Diversity Code Amendment aims to address these demographic shifts by fostering a broader range of housing options while attempting to meet the needs of a growing and diverse community.
Single-parent families, often termed “constellation families,” are set to increase significantly, with male-led single-parent households expected to grow between 22 and 56 per cent by 2046, according to Australian Bureau of Statistics data. Female-led single-parent families, which make up the vast majority of this demographic at around 80 per cent, are also expected to expand by up to 31 per cent. These projections come alongside a 78 per cent rise in single-person households in Greater Adelaide over the past 30 years. Yet, despite these figures, detached homes remain the overwhelming majority of housing stock in South Australia, comprising 77 per cent of all homes.
The proposed Accommodation Diversity Code Amendment seeks to shift this imbalance by updating planning regulations. The goal is to increase the availability of diverse housing types, from co-living arrangements with shared facilities to larger retirement villages with improved amenities. Among the key proposals are changes to apartment design rules, focusing on practical elements like bedroom and living space dimensions rather than rigid minimum floor areas. The amendment also calls for more communal spaces in shared accommodations, ensuring they provide natural light, accessible seating, and other quality-of-life features.
This amendment aligns with South Australia’s broader Housing Roadmap, an initiative designed to adapt housing policies to the evolving needs of its population. However, the challenges facing the state’s housing market are multifaceted and require careful consideration of various perspectives.
Advocates for the proposed changes highlight their potential to address demographic realities and provide more inclusive housing solutions. By allowing greater flexibility in building design, the amendments could make it easier to develop accommodation that meets the needs of single parents, students, and retirees. Supporters argue that the changes are a necessary response to population trends and a way to future-proof South Australia’s housing market.
However, critics warn of potential downsides. Some have raised concerns that increasing building heights for retirement facilities and supported living developments, up to six storeys in some cases, could clash with the character of established neighbourhoods. Others worry that an emphasis on smaller and co-living accommodations might inadvertently lead to overcrowding or reduced living standards if not properly regulated.
Another point of contention lies in the balance between housing accessibility and quality. While the proposals aim to simplify apartment designs to increase affordability, sceptics caution that this could lead to a proliferation of lower-quality housing. Striking the right balance between flexibility and maintaining high living standards is seen as a key challenge for policymakers.
The student housing sector is also a focus of the proposed changes. With the upcoming merger of Adelaide University and a projected influx of international students, the need for modern, functional student accommodation is becoming increasingly urgent. The amendment proposes policy adjustments to encourage the development of self-contained student housing with shared communal spaces, aiming to meet future needs while fostering a sense of community among students.
Retirement living presents its own complexities. As the population ages and more seniors opt to live independently for longer, the demand for diverse retirement housing options is expected to grow. The amendment seeks to address this by providing policy support for large-scale retirement developments that integrate communal facilities and accessible design. Yet, questions remain about how to ensure these facilities are affordable and well-distributed across the state, not just concentrated in wealthier areas.
Planning Minister Nick Champion has emphasised the importance of adapting housing policy to reflect the changing structure of families in South Australia. He has pointed out that divorce and family separation have significantly impacted housing demand, surpassing the effects of migration. Champion argues that the state’s housing stock must evolve to accommodate a broader range of household types, life stages, and lifestyle preferences.
His stance is backed by recent legislative changes aimed at increasing housing diversity, including measures to allow granny flats and student accommodations to be self-contained. The introduction of “co-located” housing, which permits more homes to be built in established suburbs without disrupting their existing character, has also been part of this broader strategy.
Public consultation for the Accommodation Diversity Code Amendment is open until February next year, offering South Australians an opportunity to shape the future of housing policy in the state. The government has urged residents, developers, and local councils to participate in the process, highlighting the importance of collaboration in creating housing solutions that meet the needs of all demographics.
The outcome of this consultation will determine whether the proposed changes can balance innovation with practicality. Proponents believe the amendments could provide a much-needed boost to housing diversity, particularly in addressing the needs of single-parent households, students, and the elderly. Detractors, however, caution against moving too quickly or overlooking potential risks, such as overdevelopment or inadequate quality controls.
South Australia’s housing policy debate reflects broader questions about how to adapt to changing societal needs while preserving the integrity of communities. Whether the Accommodation Diversity Code Amendment becomes a blueprint for future success or a source of contention will depend on the extent to which it addresses these competing priorities.
Support independent community journalism. Support The Indian Sun.
Follow The Indian Sun on X | Instagram | Facebook
Donate To The Indian Sun
Dear Reader,The Indian Sun is an independent organisation committed to community journalism. We have, through the years, been able to reach a wide audience especially with the growth of social media, where we also have a strong presence. With platforms such as YouTube videos, we have been able to engage in different forms of storytelling. However, the past few years, like many media organisations around the world, it has not been an easy path. We have a greater challenge. We believe community journalism is very important for a multicultural country like Australia. We’re not able to do everything, but we aim for some of the most interesting stories and journalism of quality. We call upon readers like you to support us and make any contribution. Do make a DONATION NOW so we can continue with the volume and quality journalism that we are able to practice.
Thank you for your support.
Best wishes,
Team The Indian Sun
